Nov
19
2008

Charlie makes his second 911 call in 3 years

posted by Charlie at 5:56 pm.

  • Bookmark & Share
  • Comments (9)

While I do often use this blog as a soapbox for my political opinions (are they still considered opinions even if they’re one 100% correct?) and sports leanings, I try not to turn The Lowdown into my own whiny, public version of a high school diary.

For example, I hate cats.

A lot.

But you would never know it because I try not to wax rhapsodical about my cat hatred on this blog.

But today, something rather important/bizarre happened to me.

Someone pulled a gun on me…sort of. It wasn’t a real gun, and he didn’t try and shoot me, he just pulled it out and started waving it around and yelling. You can read more about it here, or here, but I can give you the full scoop below.

I’m walking out of Greg Hall shortly before 3:20 and heading north along the quad to retrieve my bike from the rack on the north side of the building. As I’m walking, a white man who looked in his mid twenties (and a lot like a friend of mine, strangely enough) was walking south past Foellinger. He was yelling at himself. Things like “I’ve studied this for eight years! You don’t know what you’re talking about!” At first, I just thought he was pissed about a test or a professor (maybe he was), but then I noticed a large, silver pistol in his right hand (it didn’t have an orange cap or anything to signify it was fake, and glimmered in the light like real metal).

I quickly started to walk away, though no one else in the area (there were not many) seemed too phased by this guy’s rant. He quickly put the gun into a jacket pocket and continued to walk south. I considered not calling the police, as everyone else seemed to not really be concerned about it, but I realized that because of how closely he clutched the gun to his chest, it’s possible that no one else saw.

I dialed up 911, reported what I saw to the operator, and started walking my bike south towards the Undergrad to see if I could give the operator a more detailed description of where he was. From the doors to the Undergrad, I could see that he had continued south of Gregory into the middle of the South Quad between the bell tower and Gregory. He was pacing back and forth, yelling, and eventually flopped on the ground and started kicking the air. He got up, took the gun out, and started walking north, back towards the Undergrad. I started to back away with my bike, and right after he crossed Gregory, the police swarmed in from the north on foot, and in cars along Gregory. The guy seemed unphased by their presence, and refused to go down until the police drew their guns and ordered him down. As he hit the deck, he kept yelling “I! I! I! I! I!”

They put him in cuffs, and I gave this same description to the cops, who later told me that there where medical factors involved in his behavior, and I believe that as of now, he has not been charged with a criminal offense. I must say, I was extremely impressed with how quickly, and with such force the University police responded. From the time I hung up with the 911 operator, until the time he was in cuffs, was probably only about two minutes, possibly less. Six officers, at least one on foot and four in cars arrived in about the time it took him to walk from Gregory, to the middle of the South Quad and back.

That’s pretty damn good. And it makes me feel better to know that the University’s contingency plan worked if there ever was such an incident (or if that gun turned out to be real). For as much shit as I give them for giving parking tickets and ruining Friday nights (I can personally attest), I saw a Uni cop run head long into a situation that he knew to be dangerous without giving it a second thought.

There has been a lot of talk about whether or not those with mental illness, or those taking medication should be allowed to purchase firearms in the wake of NIU and V. Tech. I have my own opinions about guns and gun control, and thank god, the gun he was waving was not real. But, after observing what a true mental breakdown can mean, I can’t imagine how badly things could have ended if that gun could have shot bullets instead of plastic pellets. As a nation, we reserve the rights to remove key liberties and rights if an individual has proven himself incapable or undeserving of using them responsibility (felons not being able to vote, hunters who violate game laws having their guns confiscated as examples). Maybe it’s time we start applying that same logic to those who lack, or may easily find themselves lacking, the ability to control their behavior, and whether or not those people should be allowed to own and operate firearms.

Please leave your opinions on the matter below.

uglycatav.jpg

Seriously. Fuck cats.

Charlie Johnson: Charlie is a student in news/editorial journalism and fully supports changing our national anthem from "The Star-Spangled Banner" to "Go Cubs Go."

Comments

Michael (Michael) says:
(Posted November 19th, 2008 at 11:42 pm)

I love cats man….

Not Mary Z (Not Mary Z) says:
(Posted November 20th, 2008 at 12:25 pm)

I agree with the opinion that crazy loons shouldn’t have access to firearms. Or sporks for that matter.

However, where will the line be drawn? How crazy is too crazy to have rights? I know lots of people who “take pills.” For depression, social anxiety, and the like. I wouldn’t consider them insane though, and I think they’re mentally responsible to have the right to own a firearm. Having a mental illness does necessarily mean that some one is bat-shit out of their gourd. Also, what about people who recover from or manage their mental illness? Should their rights be taken away permanently?

XYFloyd (XYFloyd) says:
(Posted November 20th, 2008 at 1:50 pm)

Hello i love your website. my friend michael told me you were looking for a new way to earn some extra income online.
i have a site most our users are making about 20-50 dollars a day. with minimal work.. its pretty simple to do. its actually so easy to do you won’t believe ill actually pay you to do it. and its absolutely free to sign up and try.
another positive about my site unlike all the other sites. i will pay you out daily.. so you get 5 bucks in the first 5 minutes you work at my site.. request a payout and i will pay you out right then.. i promise no other sites like mine will pay out daily multiple times.
if you wanna sign up, you welcome:
http://tinyurl.com/5lsjhh

Not Mary Z (Not Mary Z) says:
(Posted November 20th, 2008 at 3:27 pm)

Spam loves the lowdown.

Sarah (Sarah) says:
(Posted November 20th, 2008 at 3:30 pm)

1. I also like cats.
2. I like it that the person spamming our blog by just looking at names of previous comment posters and pretending they are his friends.
3. You really can never tell if a person is “crazy” or not. If they are on psychopharms, they might not show the signs of being mentally ill. In addition, what is the point of giving supposedly mentally ill patients drugs to normalize their lives if we don’t actually believe that they are normal, ever. This is a devil’s advocate way to look at it but definitely something to think about.

Charlie (Charlie) says:
(Posted November 20th, 2008 at 4:53 pm)

I don’t have a hard and fast solution to the question of when to revoke a right like being able to purchase a firearm, it’s a sticky situation to be sure and should be taken extremely seriously. I only raise the question because we have seen time and again individuals who exhibited a clear pattern of violent, psychotic behavior on multiple occasions be able to legally purchase firearms, which were then used to murder multiple people.

You don’t stop selling beer because some people drive drunk, but when someone who has driven drunk in the past starts getting hammered and pulling out his keys, you definitley don’t let him get back into the car.

Eleanor (Eleanor) says:
(Posted November 21st, 2008 at 2:56 pm)

As a person with family members and friends with a variety of mental illnesses (some of which, to the average person, would be considered “dangerous”, “psychotic” and the like), the issue of firearm ownership is something that is something of gray area. Yes, there is the potential of harm, and can give rise to wondering if that person should be allowed to own a gun. However, revoking a right guaranteed by our Constitution to persons with a mental illness is akin to punishing someone for their sexual orientation, race, or disability. A person with a mental illness cannot help the fact that they are ill; it can be a combination of genetics, trauma, or a variety of other circumstances. Discrimination based on mental illness is nothing new, and sadly, quite common. While I am not a fan of guns, I respect the right of someone with a mental illness to own one. The mentally ill are no more likely to commit violent crimes than your next door neighbor. If someone is in the throes of an episode, it makes sense to not sell a gun to them, but you just can’t say “No, you’ve been hospitalized before. You’ll hurt someone.”

It does not make sense to punish someone for crimes they have not committed.

Just saying. Sorry if it was kind of long.

Charlie (Charlie) says:
(Posted November 22nd, 2008 at 11:59 am)

I would say that the mentally ill ARE more likely to commit a violent crime. But, that’s me.

Tim (Tim) says:
(Posted November 23rd, 2008 at 1:53 am)

How about nobody gets guns? Just the cops and renegade vigilantes with everything to prove, nothing to lose, and a chip on their shoulder.

Add your comment